Powered by image
Tell Councilman Coleman to withdraw his substitute ordinance

We need you to tell Metro Councilman Sam Coleman to withdraw his substitute non-discrimination ordinance.  His bill vaguely mentions non-merit factors while the bill filed by Council Member Megan Barry and nine others very clearly protects Metro employees from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. 

Just click on Send This Message and you can automatically send a message to Councilman Coleman saying that he needs to show leadership and withdraw his bill so that all Metro employees can receive real protection from discrimination.

Sample Letter for Campaign

Subject: Please, withdraw your substitute non-discrimination ordinance

Dear [ Decision Maker ] ,

As a resident of Davidson County and a voter in county-wide elections, I want to express my views to you about the non-discrimination ordinance that you have filed as a substitute for Council Member Megan Barry's non-discrimination ordinance.

While your bill may be well-intentioned, it simply doesn't offer any real protections from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. In fact, your bill is so vague that it opens Metro up to lawsuits.

It would show real leadership for Metropolitan Nashville and Davidson County if you would simply withdraw your bill or amend it to include sexual orientation and gender identity. I prefer the bill that is sponsored by 10 of your colleagues and supported by over 35 organizations including congregations, neighborhood associations, and unions. We won't settle for anything less.

Thank you,


Campaign Launched:
August 13, 2009



Background Information

Council member Sam Coleman has filed legislation to ban discrimination based on “non-merit factors,” an apparent attempt to confuse the issue and sap support for Barry’s bill.  But legal director Sue Cain already has said Coleman’s bill wouldn’t provide any new protection for gays...

We have to make it clear to our Council Members that there is no substitute for clear protections from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Councilman Coleman’s bill, however well intentioned, accomplishes nothing because it is vague. And its vagueness opens Metro up to lawsuits.